Discover the challenges and solutions in converting unstructured data into structured data from Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). Learn how Natural Language Processing (NLP), standardized terminologies, and data integration tools can help overcome these obstacles, ensuring accurate and efficient data extraction for improved healthcare outcomes.
Author: Nadia Barozzi
Chart Review and EMR Extractions in RWE Research
Two primary methods used to gather data for Real World Evidence (RWE) research are chart reviews and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) extractions. Chart Review involves manually extracting data from patient medical records, including both paper-based charts and digital documents. This method provides a rich source of detailed clinical information. EMR Extractions involve the… Continue reading Chart Review and EMR Extractions in RWE Research
Joint Clinical Assessments: Harmonizing Medicine Evaluations Across Europe Under EMA Regulations
A Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) refers to a coordinated evaluation of the clinical evidence of a medicine’s efficacy, safety, and therapeutic value, conducted by multiple health technology assessment (HTA) bodies across Europe. This process aims to streamline and harmonize the assessment procedures, ensuring that all participating countries have access to consistent and high-quality clinical evaluations.… Continue reading Joint Clinical Assessments: Harmonizing Medicine Evaluations Across Europe Under EMA Regulations
Process for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) in Germany
Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) in Germany are essential to evaluating the benefits, risks, and economic implications of medical technologies and interventions. The process involves several key institutions. These bodies have distinct roles in evaluating and deciding on the inclusion and reimbursement of health technologies within the healthcare system. Before looking at the process, let’s explore… Continue reading Process for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) in Germany
Exploring Emulated Clinical Trials: Bridging the Gap Between RCTs and Real-World Evidence
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) represent the most rigorous and robust research method for determining whether a cause–effect relation exists between an intervention and an outcome. However, RCTs are costly, slow, and often impractical to generate evidence for many important research questions. In the evolving landscape of healthcare research, the concept of emulated clinical trials… Continue reading Exploring Emulated Clinical Trials: Bridging the Gap Between RCTs and Real-World Evidence